Tuesday, 2 April 2013

Trillions hidden in offshore accounts

The Caribbean island of Nevis, seen here from neighboring St. Kitts, and the Bahamas were the locations of secret accounts that Greene County optometrist David Alan used to avoid income taxes, federal prosecutors say. After a former employee reported him to the IRS, Alan pleaded guilty to tax evasion and went to federal prison in October. More than half the world's money passes almost undetected through a series of financial black holes that shelter it from not only the tax collector but from shareholders, partners and wives,
 a Tribune-Review investigation found.Once employed by gangsters such as Meyer Lansky and Lucky Luciano, these secret bank accounts have grown so vast and lawless that some experts tell the Trib they fear the amount of money involved threatens societies from China to Africa, Europe and the United States. World leaders railed against the impact of secret havens during the G20 summit in Pittsburgh three years ago.
“They have caused a huge imbalance in the market,” said John Christensen, director of London-based Tax Justice Network, which was established by the British Parliament in 2003 to examine tax issues worldwide.  “They are the very opposite of capitalism, which is supposed to be based on transparency. They are the shadow economy.” From Switzerland and a couple of Caribbean islands, the black holes are in 70 or more countries. Christensen said studies by several organizations, including the International Monetary Fund, put the total stash at as much as $25 trillion.  In contrast, the Commerce Department pegs the gross national product of the United States at more than $15 trillion.
The black holes emit no light, according to organizations that study them, including the IRS. They hide owners and assets. Officers and directors are strawmen. Host countries get little, if any, taxes and earn fees mostly by promising to keep everyone in the dark. Few public records exist.
Owners revealed by accident typically are corporations in other black holes halfway across the world.
Though tax evasion and avoidance are only part of the reason for the shadow economy, they play a role. Tax losses to the United States amount to $1 trillion over a decade, according to the Congressional Research Service. That's the amount congressional leaders tried to cut in last summer's deficit showdown.  Across Europe, experts say tax dodgers undermine economies in places such as Greece and Spain, threatening the euro as a whole. It isn't just tax dodgers or “old money” in New York or London who use the accounts. New players have caught on.  For every $1 that Western companies invest in China, a Trib analysis found, the Chinese hide $4 offshore.  From 2000 to 2009, that net illicit outflow totaled $2.74 trillion, according to Global Financial Integrity, which champions tax reform in the developing world.  “Corruption in China dwarfs the rest of the world,” Global Financial spokesman Clark Gascoigne said. “The economists here are very pessimistic about China's long-term prospects.”
James Henry, owner of the Sag Harbor Group in New York, an international business consulting agency, said he disagrees with the methodology that Global Financial uses to reach its figure, but agrees that there is significant capital flight from China. He said at least half of world funds pass through shadow jurisdictions, at least on paper. China soon will see the effects of corruption in the failure of infrastructure the Communist Party built during the past decade, said Sarah Freitas, one of the economists who wrote the Global Financial report. Until then, the Chinese appear determined to shovel their newfound wealth out of the country. A 2011 study by China Merchants Bank and Bain & Co. found that nearly 60 percent of wealthy Chinese have or will invest overseas.
The British Virgin Islands is a favorite haven. The islands' 30,000 people host more than 400,000 corporations – at least 13 for each resident.
A simple, shady process  Offshore accounts can hide wealth and disguise losses. Enron Corp. used off-shore accounts to hide weakness in its balance sheet, records show.
The shadow economy reaches virtually every place on Earth.
Western Pennsylvania companies have more than 300 subsidiaries in countries that federal researchers deemed to be “financial privacy jurisdictions,” such as the Cayman Islands, Singapore and the South Pacific island of Vanuatu. Nationwide, doctors set up Caribbean island accounts to hide assets in case of malpractice suits. Anyone with an Internet connection could, for example, create a company in the Indian Ocean nation of Mauritius that would control a shell company in Wyoming and be run by a trustee in the Central American country of Belize.  Because it can be done so easily for just a few hundred dollars, a husband sitting at home could hide nearly all of a couple's money before driving to a courthouse to file for divorce.  ‘Step ahead of the sheriff'
Americans who hide money illegally in foreign accounts cost the United States up to $70 billion a year, the Congressional Research Service reports.  David Alan, a Greene County optometrist, set up accounts in the Bahamas and the Caribbean island of Nevis to avoid income taxes. He claimed just $38 in income – and $4 in federal taxes – for a year when actual amounts were $242,740 in income and $66,898 in taxes, prosecutors said. Alan went to federal prison in October after a former employee reported him to the IRS.  “It's a blatant defiance of the tax law,” said Sybil Smith, acting special agent in charge of the Criminal Investigation Division at Pittsburgh's IRS office. “It shifts the tax burden to innocent taxpayers, and is that fair?” Efforts to sweep up tax cheats largely have foundered. Since 2009 and the G20 summit in Pittsburgh, world leaders have stepped up enforcement but dodgers have moved money to more obscure hideouts.

Evasion was the tack followed by a Pittsburgh couple who opened a secret Swiss account in the 1960s. Because their bank was compelled to turn over account information in response to a U.S. indictment, the couple moved their money to a smaller, private Swiss bank and then to another. Finally, one of their grown children talked with Swiss bankers about coming clean to the IRS. U.S. prosecutors now are using the family to go after the bankers.  In all, more than 33,000 Americans voluntarily came forward in 2009, 2011 and this year to disclose $5 billion held in secret foreign accounts, the IRS said last month. No one knows how much remains hidden. Rules that take effect in 2014 under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act require foreign banks to report holdings by Americans or be subject to a 30 percent withholding tax on money leaving the United States.

The Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development has led the international effort to bring havens into compliance with information-sharing agreements about hidden bank accounts. Still, the group cannot estimate how much money remains hidden, according to Monica Bhatia, head of the OECD's Global Forum on Transparency.

“It's a work in progress,” she said. “As we progress, we're making life more and more difficult for people to hide money anywhere.”  Nations that benefit from taxes and bank fees on offshore accounts have no self-interest in helping developed countries track down hidden money, said Robert Kudrle, a professor at the University of Minnesota. “Nobody really wants to do anything, other than stay one step ahead of the sheriff.”
Countries pay high cost
Though the numbers are “squishy,” corporations using mostly legal tax dodges through subsidiaries in offshore financial havens cost the United States $60 billion a year, said Jane Gravelle, a researcher with the Congressional Research Service.  Offshoring combined with transfer pricing – in which profits are shifted to low- or no-tax jurisdictions – plays a big role, the service reports.  U.S. companies hold $22 trillion abroad, according to a Commerce Department annual survey, and much of it pools in places known for low taxes and tight secrecy: $1.25 trillion is in Luxembourg and Mauritius holds $34 billion.
Even when companies say they are using legal means to avoid paying taxes, it can lead to disputes.
Drug company Merck paid $2.3 billion in back taxes and penalties as part of a 2007 agreement with the IRS; GlaxoSmithKline paid the feds $3.4 billion in back taxes and fines a year earlier because of a transfer pricing dispute. Lawmakers could close legal loopholes but don't, said Dhammika Dharmapala, an economist at the University of Illinois College of Law and an expert on corporate tax havens. “It should be a no-brainer,” said Joseph Stead, senior economic justice adviser for Christian Aid, a British charity that tracks lost taxes in developing countries. “You have governments all over the world in desperate need of revenues at the minute, and this would help them track it down. And yet they're not.”
Secrecy first
Tax evasion no longer is the lead motivation for much of the money flowing into the shadow economy. Often, people simply want to hide what they have — either from law enforcement or lawsuits.
Websites offer to help small business owners protect assets from potential litigants and tell divorcees how to keep their former spouses from touching their assets. Money flowing from other countries ends up in states such as Wyoming, Nevada and Delaware with low reporting requirements. Corruption, kickbacks, bribery and illicit trade pricing throughout developing countries accounted for most of the $8.4 trillion siphoned out in the century's first decade, according to Global Financial.
In developing countries, the amount of money leaking out often equals or exceeds aid flowing in, Stead and other experts said. Fixing that problem could reduce dependence on foreign aid.

Ethiopia's 94 million people are among the worlds poorest, with per capita income of about $1,000 by CIA estimates. The country received $829 million in development assistance in 2009. The Global Financial analysis found that the Ethiopian elite transferred $3.26 billion out of the country that year. The impact of that lost bounty, it said, is clear: “The people of Ethiopia are being bled dry.”



Winston Wambua

International Offshore Specialist
 
For more information please contact me on
Mobile +971553350517

Email: winstonk@live.com
 
Skype: Winston.Wambua

Sunday, 30 December 2012

What is a UK Agency Company?

UK Agency Companies

A UK Agency Company is one that trades as an agent (or nominee) on behalf of another party, its principal. This relationship between the agent and the principal is a contractual one, governed by an agency agreement that the parties would enter into on a private basis.


Normally the Agency Company will act as an undisclosed agent, meaning that it enters into all contracts in its own name, bank accounts will be opened and operated in its own name, and correspondence and other communications with vendors and purchasers or with the recipients of services will be in the name of the Agent. However, all of these activities will be carried on under the instruction of and for the account of the Principal. The nominee is able to do nothing without the consent of the Principal.

In return for the services provided by the nominee, the Principal agrees to pay a fee which may be stipulated as a fixed fee or as a percentage of the income generated by the Principal through the Agent’s intermediation. Where the Principal and the Agent are under common control, it is important to establish such a fee at a commercial level, bearing in mind the limited nature of the Agent’s activities and the fact that it is able to offload on to the Principal any risk which it undertakes in the course of its trading activities by disclosing to any creditor or other claimant the nature of its relationship with the principal.



Any profit made by the Agent out of the fee which it receives from the Principal will be subject to UK corporation tax. However, provided the Agent is not regarded as ‘trading in the UK’ on behalf of its Principal, then the profits of the Principal are free of UK corporation tax. Careful management of the UK Agency company is required to ensure that there is no such ‘trading in the UK’ and in particular it is a useful precaution in this type of arrangement that the directors of the nominee should be resident outside of the UK  (they  may  even  be  the  same  persons  who  are  directors  of  the  principal). Furthermore, all the Agent’s services should be provided outside the UK. This would include the execution of all agreements and trading contracts. However, it is still possible to have; for example, UK directors that would do some work for the Agent provided that the extent of their activities would not constitute ‘trading in the UK’.

The Agent should also avoid deriving any non-trading UK source income (e.g. bank interest). It should also generally avoid owning UK assets.






Winston Wambua

International Offshore Specialist
 
For more information please contact me on



Email: winstonk@live.com
 
Skype: Winston.Wambua






 

Thursday, 27 December 2012

A registered shareholder and a nominee shareholder, what is the difference between ?



A registered shareholder is when the beneficial (real) owner records his/her name on the share certificate and in the Register of Shares as the owner of the allotted shares.

A nominee shareholder is when the beneficial owner chooses not to have his/her name on the share certificate or in the share register; few registered agent supply a third party to be the nominee for the real owner. The nominee appears on the certificate and in the register, in return the nominee signs a Declaration of Trust to the beneficial owner giving up any right to exercise any powers over the shares including voting rights or the right to sell or transfer these shares.

The nominee shareholder is used where the Companies Registry may be open to public scrutiny or if the owner requires a deeper sense of privacy.


Winston Wambua

International Offshore Specialist
 
For more information please contact me on

Mobile +971553350517

Email: winstonk@live.com
 
Skype: Winston.Wambua
 

Wednesday, 26 December 2012

Offshore company uses:-



As most other companies, an offshore company may enter into contracts, open bank accounts, purchase and sell various products and services, own property. A typical offshore entity, also known as an international business company (or an offshore IBC) does not pay taxes in its home jurisdiction. At the same time, it must also operate outside of the country of incorporation. A typical IBC is effectively a corporation with a limited liability. This liability is limited only by company’s shares. Shares are owned by one or more shareholders while the company is managed by director(s).”

 

Offshore incorporation can be carried out in a numeral of jurisdictions, including UAE, BVI, Belize, Seychelles, Anguilla, Panama, Nevis etc. The main decision criteria are price, reputation of the jurisdiction and time to incorporate. For instance, an offshore BVI company is the most popular among offshore entities, highly regarded by incorporators and business owners alike. An alternative would be a Seychelles company, which is the most reasonably priced among popular offshore jurisdictions. Belize IBC is a practical balance between price, reputation and proximity to fairly developed banking system of Belize.

Winston Wambua

International Offshore Specialist
 
For more information please contact me on

Mobile +971553350517

Email: winstonk@live.com
 
Skype: Winston.Wambua



 

Monday, 5 November 2012

Dubai Offshore Specialist

Definition of an Offshore Company or IBC
An Offshore company, international business company or international business corporation (IBC) is an offshore company formed under the laws of some jurisdictions as a tax-free company which is not allowed to engage in business within the jurisdiction it is incorporated in. IBCs are offshore companies that are most commonly used for offshore banking, to conduct international trade, investment activities, to offer professional services and for asset protection.

Winston Wambua

International Offshore Specialist
 
For more information please contact me on


Email: winstonk@live.com
 
Skype: Winston.Wambua