From the beginning of April this year, the subject of
«Offshore leaks» has become a favourite with the world’s media. Even the issue
of Cyprus has paled in significance. Loosely speaking, «Offshore leaks» can be
defined as the leakage of sensitive information about offshore companies and
their clients.
Offshore leaks is a planned operation
We are talking about a planned operation on a global scale.
On 4 April, the leading media companies of a variety of countries almost
simultaneously issued a sensational news story claiming that an organisation
called the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) has a
rich database on offshore companies and their clients. The overall volume of
files at ICIJ’s disposal exceeds 260 gigabytes… That is 160 times more
information than the embassy reports made public by Wikileaks in 2010… The ICIJ
files consist of more than 2.5 million documents: the registration data of
122,000 offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands; lists of people who
have made use of offshore companies; copies of personal documents including
passports; correspondence; and information on banking transactions and other
databases related to world-class politicians and businessmen, major companies
and banks. The documents have a variety of dates, the very earliest of which
came into existence 30 years ago. The names of 130,000 people from 170
countriesare also mentioned in the documents.
The first phase of the operation involved an anonymous
person collecting raw data on offshore companies. We do not know how long they
collected the information for or which methods were used to obtain the
information. It is possible that the ICIJ and individual journalists know the
answers to these questions, but they are keeping silent. They give one answer:
we cannot jeopardise our informant. It should be noted, however, that it would
have been practically impossible for a single person to have obtained such a
large amount of information. Incidentally, the idea that it was a lone person
has already appeared in the press. It is exactly the same wild assumption as
the idea that 11 September 2001 was the work of a group of terrorists under the
command of Bin Laden.
The second phase began in January 2012, when the database on
offshore companies was anonymously passed on to the organisation ICIJ. It was a
huge array of weakly-structured and weakly-organised information. In fact, the
ICIJ then had to set about reorganising this half-finished information. At this
stage, the ICIJ used the media capabilities of a number of countries, as well
as their own journalists. The bulk of the work was carried out in the field. It
turns out that the project’s most prominent external participants were the
British Broadcasting Corporation and the British newspaper The Guardian. During
the course of the work, journalists involved in the project added new
information to the data obtained from the anonymous source. Programmers and IT
specialists from the US, Great Britain and Costa Rica were also involved. At
this stage, the operation was given the official name: «Secrecy For Sale:
Inside The Global Offshore Money Maze». At this point, the work was not only
not hidden, it was even advertised in the media. At the end of 2012, a tiny
fragment from the database on offshore companies (DOC) was published which
related to a dozen offshore companies and their management structures. It was
an all-powerful delayed-action mine.
The third stage began early in April 2013. Separate
fragments of the database were made public through the media of a variety of
countries. In each country, there were several «authorised» media companies
that were selected. In Russia, for example, the «authorised» media companies
were Vedomosti and Novaya Gazeta. It is remarkable that as the organisation
holding the DOC, the ICIJ prohibited those national media companies that had
use of the DOC from passing on any of the database’s documents to
law-enforcement agencies or other authoritative bodies in their own countries.
Apparently, there is a risk that their informants could be exposed. There has
already been a report that the German media refused to provide information on
local tax evaders mentioned in the documents released at the beginning of April
to the appropriate authorities of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The third stage, involving the measured release of
information from the DOC, could last for many years. However, the first
sections of this «explosive information» could already lead to a revolutionary
upheaval of the current world order.
Offshore leaks: goals, aims and motives
Many people are asking a simple question: what are the
operation’s goals? There is the official goal referred to by the ICIJ, of
course. This is the battle with offshore companies that have become a «black
hole» in the economy, an insurmountable obstacle to social and economic
development. It is difficult to dispute the fact that the process of the
«offshoreisation» of the global economy has gone too far. The most recent
valuations of the assets hidden in the shadows of offshore companies are
between 21 and 32 trillion dollars (almost double the global GDP). Measured on
a global scale, annual losses to state budgets alone as a result of offshore
company clients avoiding taxes amount to hundreds of billions of dollars. As of
2011, losses to the US budget from the non-payment of taxes are estimated at
345 billion dollars, including 100 billion dollars as a result of tax evaders
using offshore companies. In the European Union, losses are reaching 1 trillion
euros through the use of tax optimisation schemes and a flagrant refusal to pay
taxes. It is not known how much of this can be put down to the use of offshore
companies, however. On the basis of
America’s percentage ratio, we get 290 billion euros, or at least 350 billion
dollars. Altogether, annual tax losses to the EU and the US as a result of
offshore «loopholes» amount to nearly 450 billion dollars.
Many believe that the battle with offshore companies is just
an excuse to cover up other aims. An overview of the world’s media shows that
in many of the reports, the main targets are not the offshore companies as
such, but individual oligarchs, politicians and government officials.
Individual countries are also cited as «targets». World-renowned banks,
transnational corporations and financial groups are also sometimes cited.
One theory behind the operation’s true motives is that it is
specifically aimed at dealing a blow to certain offshore companies in order to
outrun the money and clients in a small group of «select» and «untouchable»
offshore companies. Note that almost all of the documents in the DOC relate to
an offshore territory called the British Virgin Islands (BVI). Owing to a high
level of confidentiality regarding information on company owners, this area is
one of the most reliable and popular offshore territories. Since 1984, when the
British overseas territory declared itself a «tax haven», the islands have sold
more than one million companies, the true owners of which have never been
revealed. As well as the BVI, other offshore territories are mentioned in the
ICIJ press release, including Singapore, Hong Kong and the Cook Islands.
However, it should be emphasised that they are mentioned only insofar as they
serve as «offshoots» of the British Virgin Islands.
There are also other theories behind the operation’s true
goals: not to «blitz» a particular offshore company, but to stabilise the
global economy as a whole, to cause a political crisis in certain countries
and, ultimately, to move the world into a state of controlled chaos. Moreover,
the operation «Offshore leaks» is not regarded as self-contained, but as part
of a much larger, global plan. In which case, operation «Offshore leaks» is a
logical continuation of the operation to undermine the banking system of the
offshore island of Cyprus.
Of course, one can only judge the aims of operation
«Offshore leaks» hypothetically. The most important organisation involved in
the project, ICIJ, itself raises a number of questions. There is little
information about it. All that is known is that it was established in 1997, its
headquarters are situated in Washington and it includes nearly 160 journalists
from 60 countries (88 journalists from 46 countries were involved in operation
«Offshore leaks»).ICIJ was created as a project of the large non-profit organisation
Center for Public Integrity (CPI). The Knight Foundation and the Ford
Foundation act as sponsors of CPI. All of this inclines one to think that the
operation really does have global aims.
The central characters of «Offshore leaks»
In the first batch of materials published in the media, we
see all kinds of people. They are able to appear in the documents under a
variety of titles: beneficiary, shareholder, proprietor, owner, recipient of
«trust services», director, owner, co-owner, principal etc. They are all
nevertheless united by the fact that they are «tax evaders». The list includes
the names of politicians and government officials, businessmen and speculators,
members of wealthy families and bankers from a variety of countries – the USA,
Great Britain, France, Canada and Germany to Russia, the Ukraine, Mongolia,
Azerbaijan, Venezuela, Iran, Indonesia, India and the Philippines. The Guardian
points out that according to the documentation, the largest number of offshore
company owners are located in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, the Russian Federation
and former Soviet republics. The list also includes the names of 4,000 US
citizens.
In connection with the offshore scandal, a number of people
have had their cover blown in the press, including: the campaign treasurer for
French President François Hollande, Jean-Jacques Augier; Mongolia’s former
Finance minister, Bayartsogt Sangajav; Venezuela Army General José Eliécer
Pinto Gutiérrez; two sons of former Colombian president Álvaro Uribe, Tomás and
Geronimo; the daughter of former Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos, Maria
Imelda Marcos Manotoc; the Sheikh of Kuwait Sabah Jaber al-Ali al-Sabah; a
leading art collector, Spanish Baroness Carmen Thyssen-Bornemisza; the former
wife of oil trader Marc Rich, Denise Rich; and British millionaire Scot Young,
who has been convicted of fraud. The media also mentioned Azerbaijan President
Ilham Aliyev along with members of his family, Georgian Prime Minister Bidzina
Ivanishvili, Kazakh businessman Mukhtar Ablyazov, and co-owner of the company
RosUkrEnergo, Ukrainian businessman Dmitry Firtash.
As well as offshore companies and individuals, the documents
also mentioned various intermediaries who act like a kind of «pilot» for
individuals and companies who find themselves in the intricate maze of tax
havens. The different intermediaries include legal firms, trust funds, banks,
«construction» companies and so on. The intermediaries sometimes act as
beneficiaries, but only interim ones. These interim beneficiaries sometimes
form complex chains in order to safely keep the real owner, the ultimate
beneficiary, a secret. As for the role of banks in offshore schemes, the German
banking giant Deutsche Bank, the American company JP Morgan and the Swiss
companies UBS and Clariden are the most active, according to ICIJ.
Several days have passed since the first volley of gunfire
from «Offshore leaks». Government and political figures in a number of
countries have had time to respond. The internal revenue services and
law-enforcement agencies in Germany, Great Britain, Belgium, India and Greece
have declared that they will be looking into the issue of checking the
published facts that relate to their own citizens. Luxembourg’s finance
minister, meanwhile, has declared that he is ready to cooperate with other EU
countries regarding the exchange of information on banks’ clients who are
avoiding paying taxes. This means that the main country for offshore banking in
continental Europe has made it clear it is ready, on the heels of Switzerland,
to begin dismantling its institution of banking secrecy. The Austrian
government is the only one that has decided to go against the flow. It has
appeased the clients of Austrian banks by announcing that it does not intend to
hand them over to the tax authorities of other countries.
Winston Wambua
International Offshore Specialist
For more information please contact me on
Winston Wambua
International Offshore Specialist
For more information please contact me on
No comments:
Post a Comment