Structure
of an offshore company
There
are several elements in every company, each with its own purpose and function.
In the case of an offshore corporation, they are quite similar to any “regular”
company. The following is a description of the main structural elements of an
offshore company.
Registered
agent and address
All offshore jurisdictions require that all
international business companies (non-resident companies, offshore companies,
exempt companies, etc.) have an address in that country. This is called the
registered address. The formal purpose of this address is to have an exact
whereabouts of the company for the purpose of official correspondence or
inquiries from the government. Most often these are just the annual report
forms and the annual government fee notices that get sent to the registered
address.
Most
offshore jurisdictions also require maintaining a registered agent within their
territory. In Gibraltar, this position is called Resident Secretary. Usually,
the registered agent is located in the registered address of the company. The
purpose is again the same, to have some person (or, more often, a firm) who
acts as an “intermediary” between the government and the particular offshore
company.
The
name and address of the registered agent are registered on public file in the
Registrar of Companies, so this information is accessible to anyone who cares
to ask.
Memorandum
and Articles of Association
Every company files a copy of its Memorandum
and Articles of Association, or “M&A” with the Registrar of Companies upon
incorporation. These documents can be extremely brief or very detailed, depends
on the law in the particular jurisdiction and on the practices of the
particular incorporation agent. These documents lay out all the general
information about the company. Usually these documents describe the type of
company, its address, operational objects, authorized capital, the procedure
for appointing and dismissing directors and officers and their scope of
competence and responsibility, the procedure of share allocation, how
shareholder’s meetings are called and the competence of such meetings and how
it should be executed, the procedures of keeping accounts, liquidation and
similar administrative matters that are characteristic to any corporate entity.
The Memorandum and Articles of an offshore company are usually signed by a
person called “Subscriber” or “Incorporator”. The Subscriber is simply a person
(or, more often, a dedicated company) closely associated with your offshore
service provider. The Subscriber essentially incorporates the company for you
and acts as the first shareholder on your behalf. Otherwise you would have to
travel to the offshore jurisdiction and sign the documentation personally. The
Subscriber usually subscribes for the legally acceptable minimum amount of
shares in the company. After the registration of the company, the initial
Subscriber may remain registered on public file as the (nominee) shareholder,
or the minimum amount of shares that he usually holds can be transferred to the
actual client.
First
Minutes
This document represents a number of important
resolutions carried out by the Subscriber after the company is incorporated.
These resolutions shape the exact structure of the offshore company as it is
established immediately after the registration. The First Minutes contain
information about the name, registered address and registration number of the
company and also establish who is the secretary (registered agent), first
director or directors of the company and how the company shares are being
allocated to the shareholders. In some jurisdictions this information may also
be scattered into several separate documents or resolutions. The First Minutes
are usually signed by the Subscriber of the Company and the Secretary. The
First Minutes is usually the best document to look into if you wish to quickly
get to know all the important information about the given company. Depending on
the legal requirements, all or part of the information contained in the First
Minutes will also be part of the public record available at the Registrar of
Companies.
Obviously,
when the company starts to operate any further changes may be effected by
separate resolutions. Such can be carried out by the shareholders or by the
directors of the company, depending on the character of the change. If the
particular change is such that requires to be registered in the Registrar of
Companies, it should be put to the notice of the registered agent or resident
secretary, for further filing with the Registrar.
Directors
and officers
A company director is charged with making all
material decisions about the company and its business. Directors are initially
appointed by the first Subscriber, and then elected by shareholders. Quite
often the Director of an offshore company is elected for an open term “until
his successor is elected and qualifies”. If there is more than one director,
all the directors together comprise the company’s Board of Directors and then
they would have a rather complex system of decision-making process. Offshore
companies are required to have at least one director, sometimes more.
Many
offshore jurisdictions, including Gibraltar, permit the director to be a
corporation. This may sound weird, but just imagine a management firm
comprising of a team of highly competent management specialists who would take
the duty of managing the company’s regular business. Nevertheless, utilizing a
corporate director may blur the clear structure of a company and make it
difficult to comprehend, especially for people who live in countries where corporate
directors are not a common practice. More often than not the existence of a
corporate director will also indicate that the company is most probably an
offshore entity.
An
individual director makes the whole structure more straightforward, just because
we are more used to the fact that a director of a company must be a living,
breathing person. There are not many drawbacks for an offshore company to have
an individual director, apart from the fact that the services of individual
directors would usually be more expensive than corporate. Another aspect,
distant as it may sound, is the possible complication when such individual
director falls ill, goes away for vacation or, as it may happen, dies. In case
of a corporate director there will always be some person who will be empowered
to sign or act on behalf of the company. In case of an individual director,
there might not be. In such case the company would have to go through a lengthy
process of registering a change of director in its file before the new director
can act. Electing an alternate in the first place would therefore not be a bad
idea. Just as well, a company may have one or several addition officers to fill
various managerial and administrative roles within the company. The most common
officer categories include President, Vice-President, Treasurer and Secretary.
Some jurisdictions require that some or all of these roles be filled at
incorporation.
The
company directors may sometimes appoint managers or attorneys of the company,
granting them certain powers to manage the affairs of the company. The manager
may, for example, have a signing authority on a bank or securities account, or
the powers to negotiate certain types of contracts for the company or do
anything else that may be written in his power of attorney. Company
shareholders or beneficial owners are quite often appointed as managers of the
company for such purely practical reasons.
Shareholding
structure
Offshore corporations, like onshore
corporations, use shares to reflect their ownership. Shares are units
representing a participation of a person in the company. Taking (or buying) a
share in a company means simply that a person has agreed to invest some of his
personal money or assets into the company. When he has done so, he acquires the
right to participate in the profits and the decision-making process of that
company in proportion to his share as in the total amount of the capital of the
company.
There
are a few different types of capital
At first, there is the authorized share
capital. This is the total amount of money that the company has been allowed
(by its Memorandum) to take in from the prospective shareholders in return for
giving out its shares. In theory the authorized capital is supposed to be the
total amount of money that the principals of the company have decided to be
enough to get the company’s business going until the company makes its own
revenue. Most jurisdictions have a minimum required authorized share capital,
and the share capital selected usually affects the government fees payable.
Then
there is the subscribed capital. This is the amount of money that the
prospective shareholders actually agree to invest in return for their shares.
The subscribed capital can quite often be less than the authorized capital.
This would simply mean that the company has actually issued (or sold) only a
part of its shares to the shareholders, whereby the other part remains
unissued. Thus, if company XYZ has an authorized share capital of 50,000 shares
and Joe agrees to take 1000 shares, and then the company’s subscribed share
capital is 1000 shares. Joe would own 100 percent of the company. If the
company also issues 1000 shares to Mary, the company’s subscribed share capital
is 2000, and each of Joe and Mary would own 50 percent of the company (1000
shares each of the total issued 2000).
There
is also the matter of the paid-up capital. The subscribed capital becomes
paid-up capital when the subscriber (the prospective shareholder) actually
honours his part of the deal and pays for his shares to the company. In the
most trivial case it would simply mean that the shareholder has made a payment
into the company. Usually, only from this moment the shareholder acquires the
right to take part in the decision-making process of the company, that is, to
vote in the shareholders meeting. The dependence of the voting powers on the
fact of paying-up for the shares would usually be set forth in the Articles of
Association of a company.
There
is a substantial difference in how the various aspects of share capital are
treated in most high-tax countries and in the offshore financial centres. In
the “first world” countries, especially in Europe, the legal requirements for
minimum authorized, subscribed and paid-up capitals for a domestic company are
quite high, often in tens of thousands of euros. There are also strict rules
that these capitals should all be paid-up at or shortly after the registration
of the company. The logic behind those rules is apparently that a company in,
say, France, can not realistically commence any business without a substantial
money available for this purpose.
In
most offshore havens it’s radically different. Mostly, the size of the
authorized capital of an offshore company does not have a legally prescribed
minimum. If it does, the minimum is really small – think 2 US dollars or
equivalent. Consequently, there are no requirements to have a substantial
amount of paid-up capital. Thereafter, the law does not require that the subscribed
capital be paid-up in a certain timeframe. Therefore an offshore company can
have an authorized capital of 10 US dollars, of which the amount of 2 US
dollars is subscribed for (by a nominee company), but remains unpaid. At the
same time, this flexibility allows the owners of the company to choose any
amount of capital they wish, and to be very flexible with the rules of how and
when the capital has to be subscribed for and paid up. Flexibility is the
keyword here.
In
most offshore jurisdictions there is a government duty or capital tax payable
at incorporation (and often annually thereafter) of the offshore company. The
amount of this duty depends on the size of the authorized capital of the
company. However, usually there is a pre-set minimum of the government duty. As
in Gibraltar, the capital tax at incorporation is 0.5% of the authorized
capital but not less than 10GBP. It’s easy to calculate that the maximum
possible authorized capital that you can get registered by still paying the
minimum duty, is therefore GBP 2000. This is the amount that you will usually
see registered as “standard” by the offshore service provider. Going to higher
capital is possible, but will involve higher duty. Going lower is also
possible, but needless, as the duty will remain the same anyway. This concept
of “maximum authorized capital to which minimum duty applies” is repeating
itself virtually through all offshore jurisdictions.
Another
distinct feature of offshore companies is registration of shareholders on the
public file, in the Registrar of Companies. Many offshore territories do not
register the shareholders of offshore companies in the Registrar. Thus the
ownership structure or a company is in a way left to remain the internal matter
of the company. In such case the shareholder information (Registrar of
Shareholders) will usually be kept on file with the company secretary or the
registered agent, or by the director. Obviously, in such event each individual
shareholder should take care to receive appropriate proof from the company
confirming his shareholding interest in the company. Such proof can be a share
certificate.
Some
offshore territories, like Gibraltar, do keep shareholder information on the
Registrar’s file. It does not influence shareholder confidentiality very much,
because the shares can be registered in the names of third-party nominees, or
left registered in the name of the initial Subscriber. In this case, again, it
is up to the shareholder to keep the appropriate proof that he is the actual
owner of the company. Such proof can be an appropriately drafted declaration or
an agreement between the nominee and the actual owner.
Direct
registration of the shares on public file can, however, be attractive to those
company owners who wish to be completely assured that their private holdings
remain protected by being properly registered. This becomes especially
important when the company is owned by several owners.
All
in all, the corporate characteristics and structural elements of an offshore
corporation are just the same as they would be for a typical business company
in any country. The difference is in the fact that with offshore companies, all
these elements are made extremely simple and flexible, with minimum government
regulation and red tape involved. This in turn makes an average offshore
company just a more practical vehicle through which to transact business. And
that’s before any tax benefits come into consideration.
For more information please contact me on
Mobile +971553350517 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
Email: winstonk@live.com
Skype: Winston.wambua
Mobile +971553350517 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
Email: winstonk@live.com
Skype: Winston.wambua
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete